William, three, had become increasingly obsessed with the iPad
The sense of shame and sadness which came over me when I realised that my infant son was an addict will stay with me forever.
It
happened at the ungodly hour of 4 o'clock one morning earlier this
month, when my wife Katie and I were disturbed by the click of our
bedroom door opening, followed by the patter of tiny feet.
I
opened my eyes to find our three-year-old, William, standing at the
bedside table in his pyjamas. He pulled the duvet, to make sure I was
awake, then grabbed my hand.
'Daddy,' he announced, with a sense of urgency in his little voice. 'I need the iPad.'
I checked my watch, stumbled to my feet, and marched him back to his room.
'You
don't need the iPad,' I told William, tucking him back into bed. 'You
need to lie down and go to sleep. It's the middle of the night.'
At
7am, my alarm clock rang. Getting out of bed, I noticed something
amiss: the white iPad, which I had left to charge overnight on the sofa
next to our bed, had vanished.
I
walked to the sitting room. There sat William, cross-legged on the
floor, with the stolen device in his hands. He was playing a noisy video
game called Peppa Pig's Puddle Jump. The battery was already half
empty, suggesting he'd been using it for at least two hours.
When
I took the iPad away, he began to cry. Then he started screaming: 'I
want it back!' Repeatedly. The tantrum continued so long I could barely
feed him breakfast.
At
school later that day, a nursery teacher observed that William had been
lethargic. 'Is everything all right at home?' she asked Katie.
My wife had no idea how to respond.
William
has, for most of his short life, been a wonderful, loving boy whose
sense of fun and fascination rubs off on everyone who meets him. But
lately, his behaviour started to concern us.
Although our son had
never previously got up at 4am to play with an iPad, in recent weeks, he
had become increasingly obsessed with the device (and uninterested in
other toys).
We'd begun to
worry about the way he'd started losing his temper, and sometimes turned
violent - stamping his feet and even hitting me and my wife - when we
tried to ration it. Before supper that night came another episode.
While
Katie was cooking, William crept back into our bedroom, found the iPad,
and began playing the video game Angry Birds - a hugely addictive game,
where little birds are fired, via a slingshot, at piles of pigs (OK,
leave it there).
When his 18-month-old
sister, Megan, disturbed him, he hit her. She began to cry. Hearing the
commotion, Katie ran to the room and confiscated the iPad. William threw
his second major tantrum of the day. It was still going on when I
arrived home from work half an hour later.
'We can't let this carry on,' she shouted, over the screams. 'For the sake of our marriage, and our sanity, it has to stop.'
I
looked at the faces of our children, streaked with tears. She was
right. 'I'm afraid to say,' I said, 'that William has become an iPad
addict.'
Now I am fully
aware that a great many readers will greet this with a healthy snort of
derision. It is, they will perhaps say, preposterous to suggest that a
three-year-old, who happens to be excessively fond of a noisy piece of
electronics, is suffering from some sort of dependency.
'William
crept back into our bedroom, found the iPad, and began playing Angry
Birds - a hugely addictive video game. When his 18-month-old sister,
Megan, disturbed him, he hit her'
Others may argue that - by ascribing
my toddler's display of aggression and disobedience to an 'addiction' - I
am somehow seeking to duck responsibility for his behaviour, or my
parenting.
They are all entitled to their opinion. I would ask only that they read our story, and speak to other parents with children of a similar age, before leaping to conclusions. For William's iPad addiction is, I believe, symptomatic of a trend that will affect a generation of youngsters.
They are all entitled to their opinion. I would ask only that they read our story, and speak to other parents with children of a similar age, before leaping to conclusions. For William's iPad addiction is, I believe, symptomatic of a trend that will affect a generation of youngsters.
He was born in
June 2010, just two months after Steve Jobs had released the first Apple
iPad. For most of his life, our household has contained four
touch-screen devices: Katie and I each have an iPad and an iPhone.
William
is, therefore, an unwitting pioneer: one of the first children to have
spent his entire existence surrounded by computers designed to be so
easy to use that even babies can control them.
This
is already affecting most young children. Today, one in three infants
uses an iPad before they are able to talk. Two thirds use one regularly
by the age of seven. There are at least 40,000 children's games
available in iTunes.
The
devices are so effective at occupying small children that many parents
in our circle jokingly refer to the iPad as their 'iNanny'.
Indeed,
so universal is Apple's reach that, before Christmas, a U.S. company
called CTA began selling a potty with an iPad stand attached.
When using the device William would enter a sort of hypnotic trance, ignoring attempts at conversation
The key to the device's huge
appeal to children, according to experts, is its 'multi-touch' screen,
which can understand even the smear of an infant's fist.
'In
the old days, 2½ years was considered the floor at which a child could
use a mouse and keyboard and therefore work a computer,' says Warren
Buckleitner, editor of Children's Technology Review. 'Now, even a baby
can control one.'
For every parent, however, this development presents a dilemma.
We
all want children growing up in a connected world to become computer
literate. And it seems churlish to prevent them benefiting from the
roughly 40,000 'educational' apps available on the iPad.
When
William was learning to talk, for example, he was helped by an app
called Talking Carl, in which a red cartoon character listened to him
making noises and then parroted back an identical noise.
He
learned how to distinguish circles from squares by watching dancing
cartoon shapes on the YouTube app. While grasping the alphabet, he
became a dab hand at an iPad game called ABC Letters.
But William's relationship with the iPad became unhealthy.
When using it, he would enter a sort of hypnotic trance, ignoring attempts at conversation.
If
we took it away, he would lose his temper. When it wasn't around, he'd
constantly request it. William also learned to download his own apps -
mostly trashy games.
He bought about a dozen, at £1.99 a time, until I worked out how to password-protect our iTunes purchases.
He's
not alone in this. A fortnight ago, it emerged that Apple paid almost
£20 million to settle a class action lawsuit brought by 30,000-odd U.S.
parents whose children had downloaded apps without permission, sometimes
spending more than £600.
'Parents
need to realise, pre-natally, that iPads are going to be a part of a
child's world and start thinking about how to manage that'
The iPad has become a curse, rather
than a blessing, to far too many families. The day after we were rudely
awakened at 4am, I decided that enough was enough, and scoured the
internet for parenting advice.
There
are scores of message boards dedicated to the topic of iPad addiction,
filled with a cacophony of differing opinion, from child psychologists
and parents alike. But one site stood out.
It
was the home of Dr Richard Graham, a psychiatrist who runs Britain's
only rehab centre for technology addiction, at the Capio Nightingale
hospital in Marylebone London. Since 2010, Graham has worked with more
than 100 patients, including a four-year-old child who had developed an
'obsession' with her iPad.
Their
condition, he says, is often similar to that of drug or gambling
addicts, since it is controlled by the release of dopamine, the
neurotransmitter at the centre of the brain's reward system.
It
can be particularly complex to treat, he says, because (unlike with
alcohol or drugs) a sufferer cannot simply decide never to use a
computer again. Instead, they must learn to establish a healthy
relationship with technology.
'I
think parents need to realise, pre-natally, that iPads are going to be a
part of a child's world - just as TV, chocolate, and fizzy drinks
always have been - and start thinking about how to manage that,' he
says.
Dr Graham has
previously published a checklist to allow parents to gauge if a child
may be developing a technology addiction. It includes five key
indicators: showing a lack of interest in other activities, constantly
talking about technology, displaying mood swings, withdrawal symptoms
and devious behaviour. William has, at times, been guilty of all five.
After the iPad was taken away William gradually he began to realise that there were other toys in his world
Following his advice,
we duly pursued a drastic course of treatment: a 72-hour 'detox' in
which we withdrew all technology from William's life.
The
first day was brutal, he whined, he begged, he cried, and,
occasionally, he descended into a full-blown rage, stamping his feet and
shouting: 'I want my iPad.'
The next 48 hours, though, were markedly better. Gradually he began to realise that there were other toys in his world.
Long-shunned
puzzles, train sets and even the occasional book were pulled from dusty
shelves. The tantrums gradually subsided. The demands for the device
became fewer and further between. We began to believe there might be
light at the end of the technology tunnel.
After
that, we slowly re-introduced the iPad, but in a controlled fashion. It
was banned in the hour before bedtime. The volume and brightness
setting on its screen was always turned down, so as to make it less
invasive, and noisy apps that encourage bad behaviour were withdrawn.
It
was never to be used for more than two hours a day, eked out throughout
the day. And on two days a week, his life was kept completely 'tech
free', in what is often called the '5:2 screen diet'.
Most
importantly, all William's iPad use was supervised by Katie or me, a
policy endorsed by Dr Rose Luckin, of the University of London, one of
Britain's foremost experts in technology and learning.
'The
iPad is actually very sharable,' she told me. 'You can get real
benefits when you sit parents and children together and socially
interact around it, and you avoid the situation where the device becomes
the child's sole focus in an anti-social way.'
We've
been following the regime for a fortnight now. And after the
tear-filled 'cold turkey' period, William has grudgingly accepted his
new relationship with the iPad.
Earlier
this week, we sat on the sofa together, playing a spelling game. After
half an hour, he told me it was time to pack up and go to sleep.
The
iPad will always be part of his life, but the violence, the tantrums
and the 4am wake-ups are now hopefully a thing of the past.
And Katie and I will never again be employing an iNanny.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment